Tables & Bridges is conducting a national study to understand how law enforcement Community Engagement professionals plan their work, document what happens, measure meaningful change, and communicate their value to leadership and the communities they serve.
10–15 minutes · No preparation required · Save and return later
The purpose
The work is essential. The ways we understand it haven’t kept up.
Community Engagement professionals are often expected to prove value without consistent standards, tools, training, or reporting systems. This study starts with practitioners themselves: what actually happens, what gets missed, and what would help the field move forward.
Research leadership
“Community Engagement professionals have been expected to prove the value of work the profession has never consistently defined.”
This national study is led by Carlai Moore, founder of Tables & Bridges and a law enforcement Community Engagement practitioner, supervisor, trainer, and speaker. Her work focuses on helping agencies move Community Engagement beyond isolated events and relationships toward a clearly defined, measurable, and sustainable organizational discipline.
The study begins with the people doing the work. Its purpose is to identify recurring practices, reporting pressures, evidence gaps, and professional needs across agencies without evaluating or ranking individual departments.
Questions about the study? Contact info@tablesandbridges.com.
Your perspective belongs here
Whether Community Engagement is your primary assignment or one part of a wider role, your experience can add important context.
Inside the study
A guided set of questions about the realities of your work, not a test of your agency or your practice.
The goals, priorities, and partnerships that guide day-to-day practice.
The tools and habits used to capture work—and what gets left out.
The signals practitioners use to recognize meaningful change.
The support, systems, and language that would make the work stronger.
Why your voice matters
Attendance counts show that Community Engagement happened. Practitioner insight helps reveal why the work was needed, what changed, what was lost in reporting, and what support the profession needs next.
Surface the relationships, follow-through, judgment, and organizational work that routine activity reports often miss.
Show where practitioners across agencies face the same planning, measurement, reporting, and implementation barriers.
Inform future research, training, professional tools, and conference programming grounded in actual practitioner experience.
Participants may request the national findings summary and future practitioner briefing information at the end of the study. Follow-up is optional, and contact information is stored separately from research responses.
Looking forward
Findings will be analyzed in aggregate and used to identify recurring field needs, strengthen professional resources, guide future training, inform conference programming, and support responsible tool development. Individual agencies will not be ranked or publicly evaluated.
Responses will be treated as confidential and reported in aggregate or de-identified form. Contact information is optional and will only be used for the follow-up opportunities a participant selects.
Please do not submit criminal justice information, active case information, juvenile information, resident records, medical information, Social Security numbers, operational information, or other confidential or personally identifiable information. Keep examples general and non-identifying.
Add your voice
Share the realities of your work and help define what better support could look like.
Participate in the StudyNo preparation is required. Bring only your experience.
